The EIS only considers safety along the proposed new section
of HWY 131. It fails to consider the safety impact of this project
on other sections of HWY 131 that it will affect. As an analogy;
the cost/benefit ratio of nuclear power changes if the cost of
maintaining the nuclear waste for 250,000 years is considered.
The increased traffic created on other sections of HWY 131 should
be a part of the EIS safety equation. It isn't.
WDOT and the HNTB Corporation created a traffic forecast for
HWY 131
Year
Total Count
Truck Count |
Average
Daily Traffic |
| No Build |
Preferred
Alternative |
| North of
CTH F |
South of
CTH F |
North of
CTH F |
South of
CTH F |
| Present |
|
|
|
|
| Current Count |
470 |
310 |
|
|
| Total Trucks |
30 |
20 |
|
|
| Total Semi Trucks |
3 |
2 |
|
|
| Future |
|
|
|
|
| 2011 Count |
600 |
400 |
1080 |
880 |
| Total Trucks |
38 |
26 |
132 |
107 |
| Total Semi Trucks |
4 |
3 |
75 |
61 |
The WDOT statistics indicate that during the five
year period from 1994 to 1998, 262 accidents occurred on HWY
131 between Tomah and Readstown. Of these, 29 occurred between
Ontario and Rockton, the area which is to be re-built. From
the above numbers; the number of vehicles, trucks, and semis
are projected to increase by 450(80%), 89(385%), and 64(1943%)
per day between Ontario and Rockton in the year 2011 depending
on whether or not the preferred WDOT project is completed. Since
most of this extra traffic is through traffic, it will be added
to the existing traffic flow between Tomah and Readstown. If,
for instance, 83% of all this extra traffic were added to the
other sections of HWY 131 between Tomah and Readstown, the 233
accidents which occurred on these sections would be expected
to increase at least proportionately. An extra 450 vehicles/day
x .83= 374 vehicles per day. At present, the average daily traffic
count on these other sections of HWY 131 is 889 vehicles/day.
An extra 374 vehicles/day would increase the traffic count by
42%. It follows that the 233 accidents would increase by at
least 42% to 331 accidents. Assume that the deer will no longer
go near the highway between Rockton and Ontario once that section
of highway is re-built so that the accident rate will decrease
by two-thirds per vehicle mile, a WDOT prediction, and that
the traffic volume will go up there by 80% as noted above (29
accidents x 2/3 predicted reduction x 1.8 times more vehicles
= 17 accidents)
Conclusion: By reconstructing HWY 131 between
Ontario and Rockton, the number of accidents occurring along
that stretch will perhaps decrease from 29 to 17 over a five
year period. The extra traffic that this "improvement" will
introduce onto other sections of HWY 131 between Tomah and Readstown
might be expected to increase the number of accidents along
those sections from 223 to 331 accidents over the same five
year period. Taken together, this highway project would prevent
12 accidents in one area while increasing accidents by 108 in
other areas for a net projected increase of 98 accidents over
five years.
A WDOT spokesman, at a 1998 Ontario, Wisconsin
hearing, stated that if there was a large enough increase of
accidents along other sections of HWY 131, then, maybe, some
improvements could be made on those sections of highway also.
Sounds like a formula for more highway contracts.