Back to KVSA's homepage Read the various reasons why KVSA members oppose the highway project Pictures of the scenic (pre-highway) Kickapoo Valley.  Plus, download a full screen wallpaper for your computer! Find out what KVSA is doing to stop the highway project! Get in touch with somebody who can help you help the Kickapoo!

FLAWED ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT (EIS)

The EIS only considers safety along the proposed new section of HWY 131. It fails to consider the safety impact of this project on other sections of HWY 131 that it will affect. As an analogy; the cost/benefit ratio of nuclear power changes if the cost of maintaining the nuclear waste for 250,000 years is considered. The increased traffic created on other sections of HWY 131 should be a part of the EIS safety equation. It isn't.

WDOT and the HNTB Corporation created a traffic forecast for HWY 131
Year
Total Count
Truck Count
Average Daily Traffic
No Build Preferred Alternative
North of CTH F South of CTH F North of CTH F South of CTH F
Present
Current Count 470 310
Total Trucks 30 20
Total Semi Trucks 3 2
Future
2011 Count 600 400 1080 880
Total Trucks 38 26 132 107
Total Semi Trucks 4 3 75 61

The WDOT statistics indicate that during the five year period from 1994 to 1998, 262 accidents occurred on HWY 131 between Tomah and Readstown. Of these, 29 occurred between Ontario and Rockton, the area which is to be re-built. From the above numbers; the number of vehicles, trucks, and semis are projected to increase by 450(80%), 89(385%), and 64(1943%) per day between Ontario and Rockton in the year 2011 depending on whether or not the preferred WDOT project is completed. Since most of this extra traffic is through traffic, it will be added to the existing traffic flow between Tomah and Readstown. If, for instance, 83% of all this extra traffic were added to the other sections of HWY 131 between Tomah and Readstown, the 233 accidents which occurred on these sections would be expected to increase at least proportionately. An extra 450 vehicles/day x .83= 374 vehicles per day. At present, the average daily traffic count on these other sections of HWY 131 is 889 vehicles/day. An extra 374 vehicles/day would increase the traffic count by 42%. It follows that the 233 accidents would increase by at least 42% to 331 accidents. Assume that the deer will no longer go near the highway between Rockton and Ontario once that section of highway is re-built so that the accident rate will decrease by two-thirds per vehicle mile, a WDOT prediction, and that the traffic volume will go up there by 80% as noted above (29 accidents x 2/3 predicted reduction x 1.8 times more vehicles = 17 accidents)

Conclusion: By reconstructing HWY 131 between Ontario and Rockton, the number of accidents occurring along that stretch will perhaps decrease from 29 to 17 over a five year period. The extra traffic that this "improvement" will introduce onto other sections of HWY 131 between Tomah and Readstown might be expected to increase the number of accidents along those sections from 223 to 331 accidents over the same five year period. Taken together, this highway project would prevent 12 accidents in one area while increasing accidents by 108 in other areas for a net projected increase of 98 accidents over five years.

A WDOT spokesman, at a 1998 Ontario, Wisconsin hearing, stated that if there was a large enough increase of accidents along other sections of HWY 131, then, maybe, some improvements could be made on those sections of highway also. Sounds like a formula for more highway contracts.

Back to KVSA's homepage Read the various reasons why KVSA members oppose the highway project Pictures of the scenic (pre-highway) Kickapoo Valley.  Plus, download a full screen wallpaper for your computer! Find out what KVSA is doing to stop the highway project! Get in touch with somebody who can help you help the Kickapoo!