|
|
Noise Level Concerns
The Wisconsin Department of Transportation's (WDOT) plan to
replace Highway 131 between Rockton and Ontario will exceed allowable
noise levels. According to the WDOT, at a receiver location of
fifty feet from the edge of the right of way, the sound level
is 58 dBA along the existing roadway and will increase to 67 dBA
on the new roadway because of the increased volume and speed of
traffic. An increase of 10dB sound pressure level will be perceived
by the observer to be a doubling or halving of the sound.
The Preferred Alterrnative (the proposed highway) traverses
the Kickapoo Valley Reserve, Wildcat Mountain State Park and a
number of farm residences. For these types of land uses, the FHWA
considers noise mitigation when noise levels approach or exceed
67 dBA Leq(also referred to as the noise abatement criteria) ,
or when the future noise level increases by 15 decibels or more
when compared to existing noise levels. - from WDOT Environmental
Re-evaluation
According to the Noise
Pollution Clearinghouse, autos, at 55mph, produce a noise
level of 68 dB at fifty feet. Large trucks, at the same speed
and distance, produce an noise level of 86 dB. Large trucks, now
a rarity on this section of highway because of the twists,low
speeds, and bridges, will increase the sound level from the existing
58 dBH to 86 dB. This 28dB increase, a sevenfold increase of perceived
sound, far exceeds the allowable 15 decibel increase. Did the
environmental impact statement only calculate auto noise? SHA's
are required to use the operating speed if it is determined to
be consistently higher than the posted speed limit. An extra 2dB
noise level should be added to vehicles operating at 65 mph. If
two vehicles are together and making the same amount of noise,
the sound pressure level is another 3dB greater than the sound
level of just one. There is no evidence to show that the WDOT
considered these additional factors. Most of this new section
of road will go through parkland. So far, government agencies
have been careful not to refer to the Kickapoo Valley Reserve
as a park. It will, however, have trails, canoe landings, parking
areas, and other park facilities. If referred to as a park, the
truck route might not be allowable.
The Environmental Impact Statement only looks at noise impacts
along the new stretch of highway. The E-RA states that changing
the roadway alignments would attract a greater number of trips
(both car and truck) currently being diverted from SH 131 for
safety and travel time considerations. Most of this extra though
traffic would travel all the way, fifty-one miles, between Tomah
and Readstown. Forty-five miles of highway affected by this project
are ignored by the EIS to escape required noise abatement measures
along populated stretches of Highway 131. This extra traffic would
be funnelled through Tomah, Wilton, Ontario, LaFarge, Viola, and
Readstown.

Highway 131 south of La Farge
The Kickapoo Reserve park area, where the new
highway is planned, is wider than most stretches of the Kickapoo
Valley. The canyon-like walls of the Valley, in some places, are
one-quarter to one-half mile apart. This narrowness contains,
amplifies, and reflects noise. On a still summer night, owls,
frogs, and someone's dog a half-mile away can be heard by residents
and tourists alike. These sounds and the diesel noises which may
replace them are also ignored by the narrowness of the EIS's scope.
|
|
|
|